Republicans Brent Baker and Dan Loya debate their strategies for combating fentanyl and crime in the Garfield County Sheriff’s office during a forum at Rifle’s Ute Theater.

The fluorescent lights of Rifle’s Ute Theater hummed with the low-grade anxiety of a town waiting to see who holds the keys to its biggest police force. It was a 90-minute forum, moderated by KMTS News Director Ron Milhorn, where Republicans Brent Baker and Dan Loya laid out their competing visions for the Garfield County Sheriff’s office. With no Democratic challenger in the race, the June 30 primary is effectively the general election. The stakes aren’t just political; they determine who answers the call when your house gets broken into or your neighbor’s drug operation spills onto the interstate.
Loya, currently the undersheriff in Eagle County, didn’t mince words about the primary threat: fentanyl. He pointed to a recent seizure of over 500 pills in Eagle that originated in Garfield as proof of concept. He called drugs the “root of all evil,” linking the pill trade directly to car break-ins, construction site thefts, and domestic chaos. His solution? A dedicated enforcement team modeled after his work in Eagle. He wants to crush the supply at the source.
Baker, a patrol lieutenant with the Garfield County Sheriff’s Department, agreed drugs are the problem but disagreed on the tactic. He argued that Loya’s approach focuses too heavily on the highway, leaving local neighborhoods exposed. “If any of you have a drug house next door to you, where do you want your deputies?” Baker asked the crowd. “Do you want them focusing on the drug force house next to you, or do you want them on the interstate?”
Baker’s pitch was for the Special Problems Enforcement and Response (SPEAR) Task Force. He wants to catch the distributor in Denver, not just the mule driving up I-70. He wants federal prison time, not just a local citation. It’s a strategy of depth over breadth. Loya wants to clear the roads; Baker wants to drain the swamp upstream.
The forum covered more than just narcotics. The candidates fielded over a dozen questions on communication, public relations, and the sheer scale of managing the county’s largest public safety entity. But the drug debate dominated the room. It’s the issue that keeps residents awake at night, the one that turns a quiet rural county into a transit corridor for the next big hit.
Let’s look at the ballot. Baker won the GOP nomination in March. Loya successfully petitioned his way onto the same ticket. That means voters will choose between two Republicans, not a Republican and a Democrat. Jackie Harmon, the Garfield County Clerk and Recorder, confirmed the primary will likely decide the next sheriff. There’s no fallback option. No general election to correct a primary mistake. You pick one, and they get the badge.
The forum was broadcast by Rifle Community TV and is available on KMTS’s Facebook page. But watching it doesn’t change the math. The county needs a sheriff who can handle the influx of drugs moving through the valley. The question is whether you want that handled by a team focused on the interstate highway or one focused on the houses lining the side streets.
For locals, this isn’t just about policy preferences. It’s about where your tax dollars go and who shows up when you dial 911. If Loya wins, expect a heavy emphasis on drug enforcement units and seizing pills at the source. If Baker wins, expect a shift toward task forces that dig deeper into the distribution networks, potentially pulling more cases out of local jurisdictions and into federal courts.
The Ute Theater crowd got 90 minutes of answers. The rest of us get to live with the result.





