Vail Police Chief Ryan Kenney confirms the department had no calls regarding a viral stroller-slamming video until a YouTuber’s clip drew attention, highlighting a reactive policing system.

“Vail Police Chief Ryan Kenney said the police did not receive any calls related to the incident with the child in the stroller, but the police are currently investigating nonetheless.”
That’s the disconnect. A video of a woman slamming a baby into a stroller racked up more than 500,000 views on YouTube. It drew thousands of comments. Yet, the Vail Police Department had no idea it happened until a staff member spotted it on a Monday morning, two days after the fact.
YouTuber Jason Gutterman, who runs Amagansett Press, was back in Vail on Saturday. He filmed what he calls “man on the street” content. In the clip, a woman walks Meadow Drive with a baby in a stroller. When the child tries to get out, the woman slams him back in. Gutterman asks, “that’s a little rough, don’t you think?” A man, claiming to be the father, confronts him.
Gutterman isn’t just documenting traffic; he’s known for First Amendment audits. He films in public to test how local agencies handle being watched. Locals have noticed. Brandon LeBlanc with Vail Transport Towing approached Gutterman to say he appreciated the coverage.
“It’s free to be nice,” LeBlanc said on Wednesday. “I think it’s good thing for Vail that he was here.”
But the filming itself caused friction. Gutterman was confronted multiple times. The Vail Police Department was called when Karats Jewelers reported that employees felt uncomfortable with him filming near their store on Meadow Drive. Karats had dealt with a $27,000 larceny in October, so nerves were high. Officer Bill Clausen told Gutterman’s crew that they were allowed to film.
“I let them know that your guys are allowed to do that, you’re in a public place,” Clausen said.
This isn’t Gutterman’s first time in the Colorado High Country. In January 2020, he visited the Vail post office. Police asked him questions before agreeing he wasn’t breaking the law. A month later, Gutterman posted a video titled “Tyrant cops make a big mistake” from the Silverthorne post office. There, police accused him of making a threat and trespassing. He pushed back. They eventually backed down.
Criminal defense attorney George Graves analyzed the situation, though Vail Daily reported that his specific details cut off in the source material. What remains clear is that the viral nature of the video didn’t trigger an immediate police response. The department was unaware of any child abuse allegations until the video surfaced.
For context, Meadow Drive is the main artery through Vail Village. It’s where tourists walk and locals commute. It’s where jewelry stores keep an eye on the sidewalk. When a store calls the police because a YouTuber is filming, it’s not just about privacy. It’s about perception. Karats was worried. Gutterman was filming. The police stepped in to confirm the legal right to film.
The cost here isn’t just in the $27,000 theft that happened months prior. It’s in the man-hours officers spend explaining First Amendment rights to business owners who feel threatened by a camera lens. It’s in the time lost while police wait for a video to go viral before they even know an incident occurred.
Kenney’s statement highlights a reactive system. They aren’t patrolling for viral moments. They’re waiting for the internet to tell them where to look. In practice, that means the woman with the stroller could have walked away without a single call coming in from a resident. The only reason the police are investigating now is because Gutterman has 500,000 eyes watching.
The bottom line is that the community is being policed by an algorithm as much as by officers. And until the police start looking at the footage that’s already out there, they’re just guessing where the next incident is hiding.





